国网湖北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院,武汉 430077
国家电网有限公司高压电气设备现场试验与评估技术实验室,武汉 430077
湖北大地杂散电流与能源装备安全野外科学观测研究站,武汉 430077
肖冕(1994—),男,博士,工程师,研究方向为电力系统过电压与绝缘配合、高电压试验技术等(通信作者) (E-mail:xiaomian1994@foxmail.com)。
收稿:2025-09-10,
修回:2025-11-28,
纸质出版:2026-05-16
移动端阅览
肖冕, 束龙, 吴传奇, 等. 换流站极母线直流避雷器监测器不动作原因分析[J]. 高压电器, 2026,62(5):218-226.
XIAO Mian, SHU Long, WU Chuanqi, et al. Cause Analysis of Inaction of the DC Arrester Monitor on the Pole Bus of a Converter Station[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2026, 62(5): 218-226.
肖冕, 束龙, 吴传奇, 等. 换流站极母线直流避雷器监测器不动作原因分析[J]. 高压电器, 2026,62(5):218-226. DOI: 10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2026.05.026.
XIAO Mian, SHU Long, WU Chuanqi, et al. Cause Analysis of Inaction of the DC Arrester Monitor on the Pole Bus of a Converter Station[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2026, 62(5): 218-226. DOI: 10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2026.05.026.
监测器串接于金属氧化物避雷器接地端,用于记录避雷器的动作次数以及泄漏电流。标准JB/T 10492—2025和GB/T 24845—2018对监测器在8/20 μs波形下的动作电流做了规定,而对其他冲击电流波形没有做出要求。在实际系统运行中,流过避雷器的电流波形并非都为标准8/20 μs雷电流波形,导致可能存在避雷器监测器不动作情况。文中针对一起换流站极母线直流避雷器监测器不动作的故障案例,逐项开展试验工作,分析监测器不动作原因。试验结果表明:电流波形越长,波头越缓,避雷器监测器的动作电流越大。进一步推论,在本次故障案例中,流经避雷器的电流具有更宽(约6.5 ms)的时长,导致要比规程8/20 μs测试波形更大的电流幅值才能触发监测器动作,且该动作电流很可能大于700 A。
The monitor is connected in series to the earth terminal of the metal oxide arrester and is used to record the arrester operation numbers as well as the leakage current. Standards JB/T 10492—2025 and GB/T 24845—2018 specify the operating current of the monitor at the standard 8/20 μs waveform
while no requirements are made for other impulse current waveforms. In actual system operation
the current waveform flowing through the arrester is not always the standard 8/20 μs lightning current waveform
which may lead to inaction of the arrester monitor. In this paper
for the inaction case of a DC arrester monitor on the pole bus of the converter station
the test work is carried out item by item to analyze the causes. The test results show that the longer the current waveform and the gentler the wavefront
the larger the operating current of the arrester monitor. It can be further inferred that in this fault case
the current flowing through the arrester has a longer duration (approximately 6.5 ms)
resulting in the need for a larger current amplitude to trigger the standrad 8/20 μs test waveform
and this operating current is likely to be greater than 700 A.
吴德贯,周禹,余忠田,等.一起500 kV金属氧化物避雷器故障分析[J].电瓷避雷器,2013(3):58-60.
WU Deguan,ZHOU Yu,YU Zhongtian,et al.A fault analysis of 500 kV metal oxide surge arrester[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2013(3):58-60.
司文荣,施卫峰,王昭夏,等.两起同型号复合外套金属氧化锌避雷器故障分析[J].高压电器,2017,53(10):238-245.
SI Wenrong,SHI Weifeng,WANG Zhaoxia,et al.Fault analysis on two composite bushing MOAs with same type[J]. High Voltage Apparatus,2017,53(10):238-245.
贺家慧,张丹丹,张露,等.变电站工频电磁场对避雷器在线监测装置测量稳定性影响试验研究[J].高压电器,2022,58(12):117-122.
HE Jiahui,ZHANG Dandan,ZHANG Lu,et al.Experimental study on measurement stability of online monitoring device for surge arrester under power frequency interference of electric field and magnetic field in the substations[J]. High Voltage Apparatus,2022, 58(12):117-122.
吴传奇,李晓辉,阮羚,等.特高压直流接地极近区新能源接入电网的直流偏磁评测与抑制[J].高电压技术,2022,48(10):4172-4180.
WU Chuanqi,LI Xiaohui,RUAN Ling,et al.DC bias evaluation and suppression of power grid with renewable energy near grounding electrode of UHVDC transmission project[J]. High Voltage Engineering,2022,48(10):4172-4180.
孙泉,田泽群,王富豪.避雷器残压试验中雷电冲击残压波形影响因素分析[J].电瓷避雷器,2023(2):104-112.
SUN Quan,TIAN Zequn,WANG Fuhao.Factors affecting lightning residual voltage waveform in surge arrester residual voltage test[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2023(2):104-112.
钟定珠,彭向阳,李谦.电网失去中性点接地而引起避雷器爆炸事故的分析[J].电瓷避雷器,2002(2):34-36.
ZHONG Dingzhu,PENG Xiangyang,LI Qian.Analysis on MOA failure due to de - grounding of neutral in power network[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2002(2):34-36.
潘静,吴漠云.一起氧化锌避雷器爆炸事故分析及防治措施[J].安徽电力职工大学学报,2003,8(3):38-39.
PAN Jing,WU Moyun.Analysis of a zinc oxide lightning arrester explosion accident and the prevention measure[J]. Journal of Anhui Electric Power College for Staff,2003,8(3):38-39.
司增彦.一起110 kV氧化锌避雷器(MOA)事故的原因分析及对策[J].高压电器,2005,41(5):399-400.
SI Zengyan.Analysis of an accident of 110 kV MOA arrester and precautions[J]. High Voltage Apparatus,2005,41(5):399-400.
齐赛,朱晓斌,马欢,等. ZnO避雷器爆炸原因分析及防范措施[J].大众用电,2007,23(12):34-35.
QI Sai,ZHU Xiaobin,MA Huan,et al.Analysis and protecting measure on ZnO surge arrester under bursting[J]. Popular Utilization of Electricity,2007,23(12):34-35.
王红娜.一起氧化锌避雷器爆炸事故的分析[J].大众用电,2010 (3):35-36.
WANG Hongna.Analysis on explosion accident for ZnO arrester[J]. Popular Utilization of Electricity,2010(3):35-36.
韩西坪.一起220 kV氧化锌避雷器爆炸原因分析及防范措施[J].广西电业,2011(8):80-81.
HAN Xiping.Cause analysis and preventive measures of 220 kV MOA explosion[J]. Guangxi Electric Power,2011(8):80-81.
严玉婷,江健武,钟建灵,等.金属氧化物避雷器事故分析及测试方法的比较研究[J].电瓷避雷器,2011(5):63-69.
YAN Yuting,JIANG Jianwu,ZHONG Jianling,et al.MOA accident analysis and comparative study of testing methods[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2011(5):63-69.
吴德贯,刘凡栋,梁华洋.金属氧化物避雷器停电直流高压试验影响因素探讨[J].电瓷避雷器,2012(1):90-93.
WU Deguan,LIU Fandong,LIANG Huayang.A discussion of influence factors in the power failure DC high voltage test of MOA[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2012(1):90-93.
马勇,刘洋,谢天喜,等.一起氧化锌避雷器故障原因分析与思考[J].高压电器,2014,50(11):139-144.
MA Yong,LIU Yang,XIE Tianxi,et al.Analysis on a fault of metal oxide surge arrester[J]. High Voltage Apparatus,2014,50 (11):139-144.
张召涛,钟光强,李晓斌,等.一起氧化锌避雷器爆炸事故分析[J].高压电器,2015,51(8):192-196.
ZHANG Zhaotao,ZHONG Guangqiang,LI Xiaobin,et al.Analysis on an explosion accident of metal oxide arrester[J]. High Voltage Apparatus,2015,51(8):192-196.
潘浩,杜涵,马御棠,等.一起老旧500 kV站用型避雷器故障原因分析[J].电瓷避雷器,2022(6):45-51.
PAN Hao,DU Han,MA Yutang,et al.Fault analysis on MOA used in an old 500 kV station[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2022 (6):45-51.
庄飞虎,马金财,何龙,等.一起10 kV避雷器击穿与互感器烧毁故障原因分析[J].电瓷避雷器,2022(6):8-14.
ZHUANG Feihu,MA Jincai,HE Long,et al. Cause analysis of a 10 kV surge arrester breakdown and transformer burnout fault[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2022(6):8-14.
岳渝淞,李毅.带电快速更换避雷器在线监测器的应用[J].大众用电,2019(5):28-29.
YUE Yusong,LI Yi.Application of on-line monitor for quick replacement of lightning arrester with live charge[J]. Popular Utilization of Electricity,2019(5):28-29.
王从刚.避雷器在线监测器指示异常分析及处理[J].电工电气,2017(4):50-53.
WANG Conggang.Abnormal indication analysis and disposal of arrester online monitor[J]. Electrotechnics Electric,2017(4):50-53.
江栋,杨海涛,徐沛,等.氧化锌避雷器用传统数轮计数型监测器下限动作灵敏度研究[J].电瓷避雷器,2020(4):184-188.
JIANG Dong,YANG Haitao,XU Pei,et al.Study on lower limit action sensitivity of conventional counting type monitor for Zinc oxide surge arresters[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters,2020(4):184-188.
0
浏览量
23
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
陕公网安备 61010402000197