Influence of Test Methods on Pollution Flashover Performance of Composite Insulators

JIANG Xing-liang; XIAO Dai-bo; HU Jian-lin; ZHANG Zhi-jin; ZHANG Xin

doi:10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2010.02.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Influence of Test Methods on Pollution Flashover Performance of Composite Insulators

更新时间：2025-04-26

- Influence of Test Methods on Pollution Flashover Performance of Composite Insulators
- High VoltageApparatus Vol. 46, Issue 2, Pages: 8-11(2010)
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆大学输配电装备及系统安全与新技术国家重点实验室
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2010.02.005
  CLC： TM216
- Published：2010
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]蒋兴良,肖代波,胡建林,张志劲,张鑫.试验方法对复合绝缘子污秽闪络特性的影响[J].高压电器,2010,46(02):8-11.

JIANG Xing-liang, XIAO Dai-bo, HU Jian-lin, et al. Influence of Test Methods on Pollution Flashover Performance of Composite Insulators[J]. High voltageapparatus, 2010, 46(2): 8-11.
[1]蒋兴良,肖代波,胡建林,张志劲,张鑫.试验方法对复合绝缘子污秽闪络特性的影响[J].高压电器,2010,46(02):8-11. DOI： 10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2010.02.005.

JIANG Xing-liang, XIAO Dai-bo, HU Jian-lin, et al. Influence of Test Methods on Pollution Flashover Performance of Composite Insulators[J]. High voltageapparatus, 2010, 46(2): 8-11. DOI： 10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2010.02.005.

摘要

IEC及中国相关标准推荐了几种绝缘子污秽的试验方法

但不同试验方法对复合绝缘子污闪特性的影响并不明确。以复合绝缘子为例

分别采用恒压升降法、均匀升压法、最大耐受法试验研究了复合绝缘子的交流污秽闪络特性。结果表明:试验方法对污秽影响特征指数a值的影响不明显;在标准偏差取7.0%时

采用均匀升压法得到的50%闪络电压比采用恒压升降法得到的50%耐受电压高0.5个标准偏差

采用最大耐受法得到的最大耐受电压Umw等于采用恒压升降法得到的闪络概率为10%的污闪电压;不同的试验方法得到的试验结果存在内在联系

可以根据试验的具体情况

选择适当试验方法。

Abstract

Different methods for testing pollution flashover performance are recommended in IEC and Chinese standards

but the differences among the test methods are not pointed out.In this paper

the pollution flashover performance of composite insulator is tested with uniform increase voltage method

50% withstand voltage method

and maximum withstand voltage method

respectively.The results indicate that the influences of different test methods on the index value a are not obvious.For the standard deviation of 7.0%

the 50% flashover voltage from uniform increase voltage method is 0.5 standard deviation higher than that from the 50% withstand voltage method

the maxium withstand voltage Umw is equal to the flashover voltage from the uniform increase voltage method with a flashover probability 10%.It is concluded that there exist internal relations among the results from different test methods

so appropriate test method may be chosen according to specific situation of test.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

359

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Seismic Response and Impact Analysis of UHV Composite Double-pillar Equipment with Tubular-busbar Coupling

Thermal Aging Characteristics Analysis of HTV Silicone Rubber Composite Insulator Shed

Study on Hydrophobicity Diagnosis Method of Composite Insulator Based on Lightweight Convolution Neural Network

Study on Distribution of Decay-like Fracture of Composite Insulator

Study on the morphology evolution of condensation droplet on superhydrophobic coating surface and its influence on surface discharge

Related Author

LI Qiang

ZHANG Changhong

YU Rongxing

CHEN Chaoquan

LYU Li

XIA Lingzhi

HUANG Hongfei

GUO Kaihang

Related Institution

CSG Extra High Voltage Power Transmission Company, Dali Bureau

Extra High Voltage Power Transmission Company Electric Power Research Institute

China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd.

State Grid Anhui Electric Power Research Institute

Beijing International S & T Cooperation Base for Plasma Science and Energy Conversion, Institute of Electrical Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences

⁰