Research on Seismic Performance of 550 kV Gas Insulated Metal Enclosed Transmission Line (GIL) Under Multi-point Input
Technical Discussion|更新时间:2025-06-30
|
Research on Seismic Performance of 550 kV Gas Insulated Metal Enclosed Transmission Line (GIL) Under Multi-point Input
High Voltage ApparatusVol. 61, Issue 7, Pages: 234-244(2025)
作者机构:
1.西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,西安 710055
2.西安建筑科技大学结构工程与抗震教育部重点实验室,西安 710055
3.中国联合工程有限公司,杭州 310051
4.中铁二十局集团有限公司,西安 710016
作者简介:
基金信息:
Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi(2020PT-038);Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi(2022SF-375);Research Project of China Railway 20th Bureau Group Co., Ltd.(YF2200LJ12B)
ZHANG Tuo, LI Binbin, WANG Sheliang, et al. Research on Seismic Performance of 550 kV Gas Insulated Metal Enclosed Transmission Line (GIL) Under Multi-point Input[J]. High voltage apparatus, 2025, 61(7): 234-244.
DOI:
ZHANG Tuo, LI Binbin, WANG Sheliang, et al. Research on Seismic Performance of 550 kV Gas Insulated Metal Enclosed Transmission Line (GIL) Under Multi-point Input[J]. High voltage apparatus, 2025, 61(7): 234-244. DOI: 10.13296/j.1001-1609.hva.2025.07.028.
Research on Seismic Performance of 550 kV Gas Insulated Metal Enclosed Transmission Line (GIL) Under Multi-point Input
For studying the seismic response of gas insulated metal enclosed transmission line (GIL)
the seismic simulation vibration stand test and finite element analysis of a 550 kV GIL pipeline unit are performed
and the partial GIL finite element model under the whole station domain is set up based on the tested and verified GIL pipeline unit model to study its seismic performance under multi point input. The research result shows that the safety factor of the three pillar insulators under the test and finite element analysis is minimum and is the weak part of GIL; The finite element analysis result of GIL pipeline unit is in good agreement with the vibration stand test result
and the maximum error of mode analysis
peak acceleration response and Von-Mise stress are 8.5%
8% and 12% respectively
indicating that the established finite element model and parameter setting are reasonable. The stress response of key parts of GIL under
YZ
2D multi-point input is greater than the consensus input
and the displacement peak response is increased by 31% over the consistent input. Therefore
the influence of multi-point input shall be considered in the GIL seismic design. The input of the seismic response at 3D (150 m/s) of GIL is small
and is increased by only 6.4% compared to
YZ
2D multi point input. Therefore
in the engineering design
only consideration of the 2D multi-point input can meet the requirements of the engineering calculation.